Chittagong Hill Tracts High Court of Chittagong took the cut
The High Court has summoned the deputy commissioner of Chittagong to tell the reasons why the action was not taken according to the court's directive on filling the soil with money from those who had spent the lands of Chittagong's Banshkhali Gunagari Government Hill in Chittagong. Appearing before the court on November 22, Deputy Commissioner Zillur Rahman Chowdhury has been asked to explain this.
The bench, comprising Justice Syed Mohammad Dastgir Hossain and Justice Ataur Rahman Khan, gave the order on Tuesday.
In Banskhali, media reports were published in the headline titled 26,000 trucks sold in six months. Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh, a human rights and environmental organization, filed a writ in 2011 in the High Court. On July 4 of that year, the High Court gave the interim periodic three-point directive with the primary hearing. In order, the court directed that mountains should be cut, so that no one could cut it, take legal action against those who cut the mountain, and pay back money from the people who cut the mountain, and return to the hills. On 6 June this year, the High Court ordered the DC (DC) to know what steps have been taken to fill the soil. Then on July 30 the Deputy Commissioner submitted the report to the court. The court ordered the deputy commissioner to appear before the court on November 22 in the hearing on the progress of the implementation of the directions.
Advocate Manzill Murshid argued for the petition on behalf of the court. Later, he said in the first light, that the Deputy Commissioner did not cut the hills before, who supervised and reported the case of those who cut the mountain, report it. In the report submitted on July 30 last, the DC administration has taken action against the hill supervisors and those who have cut the mountain, taking action against them. But those who did not pay anything from the mountains, they did not say anything about taking the money in the past. In this situation, the Deputy Commissioner was asked to appear before the court on November 22 to explain why the action was not taken according to the court's directive.
The bench, comprising Justice Syed Mohammad Dastgir Hossain and Justice Ataur Rahman Khan, gave the order on Tuesday.
In Banskhali, media reports were published in the headline titled 26,000 trucks sold in six months. Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh, a human rights and environmental organization, filed a writ in 2011 in the High Court. On July 4 of that year, the High Court gave the interim periodic three-point directive with the primary hearing. In order, the court directed that mountains should be cut, so that no one could cut it, take legal action against those who cut the mountain, and pay back money from the people who cut the mountain, and return to the hills. On 6 June this year, the High Court ordered the DC (DC) to know what steps have been taken to fill the soil. Then on July 30 the Deputy Commissioner submitted the report to the court. The court ordered the deputy commissioner to appear before the court on November 22 in the hearing on the progress of the implementation of the directions.
Advocate Manzill Murshid argued for the petition on behalf of the court. Later, he said in the first light, that the Deputy Commissioner did not cut the hills before, who supervised and reported the case of those who cut the mountain, report it. In the report submitted on July 30 last, the DC administration has taken action against the hill supervisors and those who have cut the mountain, taking action against them. But those who did not pay anything from the mountains, they did not say anything about taking the money in the past. In this situation, the Deputy Commissioner was asked to appear before the court on November 22 to explain why the action was not taken according to the court's directive.
No comments